Author Topic: IQ  (Read 5109 times)

Black Hole Sun

  • Guest
Re: IQ
« Reply #40 on: May 23, 2009, 11:43:15 AM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.

Offline Dave

  • I got my way, and that means I was right.
  • Head Honcho
  • *****
  • Posts: 11071
  • 13062 peanuts
  • View Inventory
  • Send Money To Dave
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't care if I lose because my heroes did too.
Re: IQ
« Reply #41 on: May 23, 2009, 11:43:58 AM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
Loathsomeness waits and dreams in the deep, and decay spreads over the tottering cities of men.

Black Hole Sun

  • Guest
Re: IQ
« Reply #42 on: May 23, 2009, 11:47:09 AM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
That still wasn't the queen voicing herself.

Offline Dave

  • I got my way, and that means I was right.
  • Head Honcho
  • *****
  • Posts: 11071
  • 13062 peanuts
  • View Inventory
  • Send Money To Dave
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't care if I lose because my heroes did too.
Re: IQ
« Reply #43 on: May 23, 2009, 11:47:51 AM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
That still wasn't the queen voicing herself.
You sure?
Loathsomeness waits and dreams in the deep, and decay spreads over the tottering cities of men.

Black Hole Sun

  • Guest
Re: IQ
« Reply #44 on: May 23, 2009, 11:52:38 AM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
That still wasn't the queen voicing herself.
You sure?
Yes. The queen doesn't have the time to voice herself in an AMERICAN TV show.

Offline Dave

  • I got my way, and that means I was right.
  • Head Honcho
  • *****
  • Posts: 11071
  • 13062 peanuts
  • View Inventory
  • Send Money To Dave
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't care if I lose because my heroes did too.
Re: IQ
« Reply #45 on: May 23, 2009, 11:54:16 AM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
That still wasn't the queen voicing herself.
You sure?
Yes. The queen doesn't have the time to voice herself in an AMERICAN TV show.
But the Simpsons never uses impersonators. They always get the real voices.
Loathsomeness waits and dreams in the deep, and decay spreads over the tottering cities of men.

Black Hole Sun

  • Guest
Re: IQ
« Reply #46 on: May 23, 2009, 11:55:39 AM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
That still wasn't the queen voicing herself.
You sure?
Yes. The queen doesn't have the time to voice herself in an AMERICAN TV show.
But the Simpsons never uses impersonators. They always get the real voices.
...That's a lie and you damn well know it. They get impersonators to voice the presidents.

Offline Placeholder

Re: IQ
« Reply #47 on: May 23, 2009, 05:17:29 PM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
That still wasn't the queen voicing herself.
You sure?
Yes. The queen doesn't have the time to voice herself in an AMERICAN TV show.
But the Simpsons never uses impersonators. They always get the real voices.
...That's a lie and you damn well know it. They get impersonators to voice the presidents.
And a couple of other guys.
Placeholder

Black Hole Sun

  • Guest
Re: IQ
« Reply #48 on: May 23, 2009, 05:18:14 PM »
Oh, that one. Didn't she have a brief speaking role in the Camp Krusty episode?
I... Sincerely doubt that.
She was knighting Krusty when Bart took over the camp. I own the episode.
That still wasn't the queen voicing herself.
You sure?
Yes. The queen doesn't have the time to voice herself in an AMERICAN TV show.
But the Simpsons never uses impersonators. They always get the real voices.
...That's a lie and you damn well know it. They get impersonators to voice the presidents.
And a couple of other guys.
Yup.

Offline KPH2293

Re: IQ
« Reply #49 on: June 01, 2009, 03:31:32 AM »
According to free-iqtest.net, mine is 154.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2009, 07:56:31 AM by KPH2293 »

Offline Stooben

Re: IQ
« Reply #50 on: June 01, 2009, 04:59:40 AM »
According to free-iqtest.com, mine is 154.
Cool.

Offline Master Lucario

Re: IQ
« Reply #51 on: June 18, 2009, 08:53:52 PM »
IQ is indeed flawed.

If there was a test about video games, I'd pass with flying colors.

Academics? I'd fail miserably.

IQ tests are not personalized to fit the individual.

Therefore, they cannot be correct.

But I took the one at Free-iqtest.com, and I got...

126.

Offline Xpike

Re: IQ
« Reply #52 on: June 19, 2009, 08:56:51 AM »
iqtest.com says my IQ is 109.
I wasn't even trying.
lalala

Offline Placeholder

Re: IQ
« Reply #53 on: June 21, 2009, 02:51:09 AM »
First, guys, it's free-iqtest.net, not .com.

Secondly, it says I've got an IQ of 145.
Placeholder

Re: IQ
« Reply #54 on: July 30, 2009, 11:40:26 AM »
K'. IQ tests are nothing to get upset over. I take tests and when I was in middle school I was averaging sophomore level. My best friend averaged higher but she has absolutely no and I do mean no common sense! So which of us is the smarter one. Anything over 160 is well above average and almost a genius. Would you want that pressure? I think not.

Put a red rose on my grave!

Offline Placeholder

Re: IQ
« Reply #55 on: July 30, 2009, 07:41:47 PM »
K'. IQ tests are nothing to get upset over. I take tests and when I was in middle school I was averaging sophomore level. My best friend averaged higher but she has absolutely no and I do mean no common sense! So which of us is the smarter one. Anything over 160 is well above average and almost a genius. Would you want that pressure? I think not.

This topic is for discussion of IQ, not intelligence.
Placeholder

Re: IQ
« Reply #56 on: August 03, 2009, 12:50:25 PM »
K'. IQ tests are nothing to get upset over. I take tests and when I was in middle school I was averaging sophomore level. My best friend averaged higher but she has absolutely no and I do mean no common sense! So which of us is the smarter one. Anything over 160 is well above average and almost a genius. Would you want that pressure? I think not.

This topic is for discussion of IQ, not intelligence.
That's evident or you all wouldn't be upset by a number!

Put a red rose on my grave!

Offline 2257

Re: IQ
« Reply #57 on: September 07, 2009, 01:49:02 AM »
free-iqtest.net claims my IQ is 157. However, I got 138 (which is more realistic IMO) from a different test on the same day.

It seems to me that a website giving a high result is likely to get more repeat visitors, and thus more ad revenue. Therefore, artificially inflating scores would be a good business decision, right?

Offline Placeholder

Re: IQ
« Reply #58 on: October 03, 2009, 07:21:09 AM »
Yes. I highly doubt that my IQ would even be close to 154.
Placeholder

Offline Stooben

Re: IQ
« Reply #59 on: October 04, 2009, 02:51:52 PM »
So, I just took an IQ test issued by the college I attend. It gave me a 149, whereas free-iqtest.net gave me a 174. (Where I previously got a 163.) Then I took another one and purposely screwed up quite a few questions; I got a 122.

I tend to think 2257 is right. I always felt that IQ tests were highly flawed, but I'm thinking he hit it dead on.